The
Sutherland Report
With Respect to Old Age:
Long Term Care - Rights and
Responsibilities
A Report by
The Royal Commission on Long Term Care
Chairman: Professor Sir Stewart Sutherland
Presented to Parliament by
Command of Her Majesty
March 1999
This is just a brief extract from the report - the
complete report can be viewed at Official
documents web site click on the link to go direct to the cover page.
The Commission took the view that old age should not be seen as a problem,
but a time of life with fulfilments of its own. To provide security in old
age and proper care for those that need it our main recommendations are
that:
- The costs of long-term care should be
split between living costs, housing costs and personal care. Personal
care should be available after assessment, according to need and paid
for from general taxation: the rest should be subject to a co-payment
according to means.
- The Government should establish a
National Care Commission to monitor trends, including demography and
spending, ensure transparency and accountability in the system,
represent the interests of consumers, and set national benchmarks, now
and in the future.
The Commission sought to recommend a way of paying for long-term care
which brings improvements in the short term and which is affordable and
sustainable. It is a complex issue and none of the options are easy. Three
key principles informed the approach we have taken:
- Responsibility for provision now and in the future should be shared
between the state and individuals - the aim is to find a division
affordable for both and one which people can understand and accept as
fair and logical
- Any new system of state support should be fair and equitable
- Any new system of state support should be transparent in respect of
the resources underpinning it, the entitlement of individuals under it
and what it leaves to personal responsibility.
The Commission conclude that doing nothing with respect to the current
system is not an option. It is too complex and provides no clarity as to
what people can expect. It too often causes people to move into
residential care when this might not be the best outcome. Help is
available to the poorest but the system leads to the impoverishment of
people with moderate assets before they get any help. There is a degree of
fear about the system which is of concern in a modern welfare state. It is
riddled with inefficiencies.
The time has come for it to be properly
modernised.
|
|