|
NHS CUTBACKS
Mounting NHS
deficits have been caused by political meddling and damaging
policies, hospital consultants say.
The British Medical Association attacked the government's
handling of the NHS as ministers revealed a big rise in the
size of the deficit.
The deficit for 2005-06 was ?512m - more than double the
figure for the previous year.
But acting NHS chief executive, Sir Ian Carruthers said
the health service was improving significantly in all areas.
He told the BBC: "Waiting times are at their lowest
position ever, there is greater access in terms of a bigger
number of people receiving cancer treatment, and premature
deaths from cancer and heart disease are reduced.
"And services such as stroke, mental health and care of
the elderly are improving."
But the BMA said the government was wasting money on
involving the private sector and management consultants.
The unaudited accounts for the NHS in England for the
last financial year show that the total deficit was more
than ?100m down on the mid-year projection of ?620m.
Paul Miller, chairman of the BMA's consultants committee,
who addressed a conference of doctors on Wednesday, said
money was being wasted by a series of initiatives.
He said hospital facilities were being left underused
because private treatment centres, which carry out minor
surgery, had been given a guaranteed numbers of patients.
Waiting times
And he also pointed the finger of blame at PFI deals,
which use private money to build NHS hospitals, claiming
firms had made money when facilities had not been built or
vastly delayed.
Meanwhile, he claimed about ?1bn was being spent by the NHS on management consultants each year "without any clear
benefit".
"Yes, bad management is a problem in some places, but the
biggest cause is the interference from government. Something
is going badly wrong and it is demoralising for staff," he
said.
But Health Minister Andy Burnham said Mr Miller's
analysis was "skewed". "It is the government's reforms that
have delivered these improvements for patients and I find it
staggering that Mr Miller seems unaware of these facts."
He added the NHS's annual report, released on Wednesday,
confirmed waiting times are falling and the quality of
treatment improving.
And Sir Ian Carruthers warned against what he describes
as hysteria over NHS finances and job cuts.
But latest figures from the Royal College of Nursing
paints a less rosy figure, estimating that 15,000 job cuts
have been announced in recent months. This comes on top of
the hospitals which have also reported closing wards and
delaying operations.
The causes of the deficits are also set to be explored in
a joint National Audit Office and Audit Commission report to
be published after the government reveals the deficit figu
Over
2,000 axed in NHS cutbacks Mar 23 2006 By
The Huddersfield Daily Examiner
POLITICIANS have accused the Government
of failing NHS staff and their patients by axing hundreds of
jobs at a London hospital.
The Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead,
north London, is to shed 480 posts under plans to save ?25m
in the next year, it was announced last night.
Hospital bosses said they would do
everything to ensure forced redundancies were kept to a
minimum, but they could not be ruled out.
More than 2,000 job cuts have now been
announced at hospitals across the UK in the past week.
The Conservatives accused the
Government of abandoning the NHS, saying Chancellor Gordon
Brown had ignored it in yesterday's Budget. And campaigners
accused hospital chiefs of "smuggling" out the announcement
under the cover of the Budget.
MSPs of all parties have called for a freeze on
hospital cuts amid fears of a political backlash.
(Evening Times 2004)
Members of the Scottish Parliament's health committee,
including previously loyal Executive backers have demanded
Health Minister Malcolm Chisholm delay planned hospital
cutbacks until after a national framework for NHS reforms in
Scotland is complete next March
Report slams NHS cuts
(2/11/05) Protestors against the proposed cuts and
closures to NHS services at Felixstowe, Sudbury,
Hertesmere, Bury St Edmunds & Newmarket are taking
their protest direct to number 10 today, along with
a copy of a new report issued by UNISON.
The report Eastern Promise Broken puts the
perilous state of NHS finances and its impact on
patient care under the microscope. It focuses on the
scale of proposed hospital and ward closures,
cancelled treatments, jobs cut and recruitment
freezes made across Eastern England, because of the
rising debt in NHS trusts.
The focus of the report is on Eastern England, but
it explains that many of the experiences of trusts
in this area are replicated across the UK.
The report said the root cause of the cash crises in
Eastern England, as elsewhere in the NHS, is not
waste or incompetence, but insufficient funding to
cover all the ambitious targets trusts have been
set. |
Hospitals across the country have a black
hole in their finances, caused by years of underinvestment.
?That hole has to be filled or we will see wards and
hospitals closing, nurses out of a job, treatments cut and
fewer patients treated, as trusts struggle to balance the
books.
?As an immediate measure the government should row-back on
its requirement for a two year payback period ? this is
simply unrealistic. In the longer term, it needs to bite the
bullet and wipe out the years of under funding with a
one-off cash injection. This would clear the accumulated
debts and give trusts a firm foundation on which to build a
health service fit for the future.?
The
NHS in Oxfordshire is being driven currently by
financial crises, but the Labour Government is not
listening.
Thames Valley 'Health Economy' already
receives the lowest amount per head of population in the
country. The ?34m deficit in Oxfordshire has arisen partly
because of our excellent hospitals, which provide specialist
care not just to the local area but nationally and
internationally.
The Thames Valley Strategic Health Authority
should have been managing this financial crisis at a much
earlier stage. Now cuts are proposed across the board.
The Mental Healthcare Trust, which is
operating within budget, has been told to make huge savings,
with the loss of medical staff, the possible closure of the
Barnes Unit for people who self-harm, temporary closure of
one adult ward, closure of day centres and cuts in therapies
to help patients recover from mental illness.
The Nuffield Orthopaedic Trust will close a
ward. The John Radcliffe Hospital may entirely suspend
operations for some non-urgent conditions such as varicose
veins, hernias and ophthalmological problems
The Royal Free Hospital in London is to axe hundreds of
jobs in the latest round of cost cutting in the NHS.
The RFH in Hampstead said around 480 posts will be lost
under plans to achieve savings of ?25 million in the next
year.
Third of all NHS
trusts plan cuts, says BMA
By Nic Fleming, Medical Correspondent
(Filed: 24/09/2005)
A third of NHS trusts are planning to cut
services including cancelling operations, closing wards and
making doctors and nurses redundant, doctors' leaders warned
yesterday
Doctors reject ?people power?
By Judith Duffy Health Correspondent -
Sunday Herald -03 September 2006
DOCTORS? and nurses? leaders have
rejected proposals that would allow
members of the public to be directly
elected to health boards over concerns
it will make the NHS ?too politicised?.
Bill Butler, Labour MSP for Glasgow
Anniesland, introduced the Health Board
Elections Bill to Holyrood in March, in
an attempt to make boards more
accountable and give patients more say
in how local services are run.
The move was prompted by decisions by
several health boards to cut services,
such as the recent axing of the accident
and emergency unit at Monklands Hospital
in Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, which
sparked a public and political backlash.
Under the proposals,
?first-past-the-post? public elections
would take place every four years
through a postal ballot, to vote half of
the board into office plus two members.
Councillors and politicians would be
barred from standing.
The remainder would be appointed as
under the current system. NHS boards
would meet the cost of elections from
existing budgets.
Holyrood?s health committee is
accepting submissions regarding the
bill. Among backers are Unison, the STUC,
the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and
Fife and Orkney councils. Those against
include the Executive, the British
Medical Association (BMA) Scotland, the
Convention of Scottish Local Authorities
and NHS boards including Ayrshire and
Arran, Highland, and Greater Glasgow and
Clyde.
BMA Scotland stated the bill would
make it even harder for health boards to
make difficult decisions, and argued the
cost to the NHS could be as much as ?1
million in the first year ? money which
could be spent on frontline patient
care. Chairman Dr Peter Terry said:
?Elections to NHS boards will not
improve public engagement with the NHS,
neither will they remove the need for
boards to make difficult decisions. What
they will do is politicise the NHS to an
unacceptable degree.?
The Royal College of Nursing
Scotland?s submission states: ?Our
members voted overwhelmingly in favour
of less direct political control over
the NHS ? We are concerned that elected
members could be pre-occupied with their
own re-election prospects when decisions
are being taken in the run-up to
election periods.?
Dr Robert Cumming, chairman of the
Scottish Health Campaigns Network,
backed the bill, saying: ?The Monklands
situation is a classic example. The
health board has totally disregarded the
public consultation procedure ? this
sort of thing wouldn?t happen if there
was a democratically elected health
board.?
The health committee is set to begin
taking spoken evidence in October.
03 September 2006
|